Oura Ring vs. Ultrahuman Ring Air – Which Smart Ring Fits Your Lifestyle?

Smart rings have quietly entered their moment. For people who care about sleep, stress, and metabolic (and immune) resilience—but don’t want a chunky smartwatch or high EMF exposure—they make a lot of sense. Two of the best are the Oura Ring Gen 4 and the Ultrahuman Ring Air. I’ve been testing these rings out for the purpose of this review; wearing them both simultaneously for the last few weeks.

If you want the short version upfront:

  • If you’re someone who gets easily cognitively overloaded, or you just prefer a clean, distilled, “tell me what matters most” experience, Oura will feel like home (even with the subscription which increases longterm cost).

  • If you love extra data, enjoy tinkering, or refuse to pay for a broad-sweeping subscription you don’t fully use, Ultrahuman is your ring.

If you want the deeper take—keep reading.

Design & Wearability

Both rings look like jewelry (not medical devices), which is the point. They’re titanium, lightweight, and come in similar finishes.

  • Oura Gen 4: 3.3–5.2g | 2.8mm thick | beveled edge
    Clean look, great for daily wear, sizes 4–15. Some people report the gold scuffs more easily.

  • Ultrahuman Ring Air: 2.4–3.6g | 2.45–2.8mm thick | wider (8.1mm) with squared edges
    Coated in tungsten carbide for legit scratch resistance. Hypoallergenic resin interior. Sizes 5–14.

Real-world difference:
Ultrahuman is technically lighter and thinner, but the wider profile means you notice it more on clothes or tighter pockets. Oura feels more “set it and forget it.”

What They Actually Track

Both rings monitor:

  • HR + HRV

  • Sleep + sleep stages

  • Temperature

  • SpO2

  • Stress signals

  • Activity (passive detection)

But they diverge in how they interpret data and what they prioritize.

Oura Ring Gen 4

Oura leans holistic and recovery-oriented:

  • Readiness, Sleep, Activity scores

  • Daytime stress + resilience

  • Illness detection

  • Cardiovascular Age + Cardio Capacity

  • Automatic activity detection

  • Natural Cycles integration for cycle/ovulation

The women’s health piece is one of the strongest, and the data feels more “digestible” for the average brain.

Ultrahuman Ring Air

Ultrahuman leans biohacker + optimization:

  • Dynamic Recovery (real-time)

  • Continuous HRV

  • Stress Rhythm

  • Circadian Alignment

  • AFib screening (night)

  • Screentime tolerance (funny but surprisingly accurate)

  • Caffeine window

  • Vitamin D alerts

  • Optional “PowerPlugs” like ovulation + weight management via CGM

Key personality difference:
Oura gives you a calm, aggregated interpretation of your physiology.


Ultrahuman gives you knobs to turn and variables to tweak. I definitely found it took some adjustment getting used to the UltraHuman interface. But, once I’d become accustomed to it, I found the additional data useful for my goals. I added the pregnancy and Vitamin D plug-ins (these were free). Surprisingly, I wasn’t offended by the guide to optimizing my caffeine window either!

For those in the USA, UltraHuman provides the option of home bloodtesting; integrating this information into your daily read outs and suggestions. 

Additionally, one could purchase their glucose monitoring or home air and EMF monitoring devices.

Accuracy-wise: early testing suggests Ultrahuman catches micro shifts in HR/HRV during activity slightly better, while Oura is incredibly consistent on recovery + illness cues.

Battery Life

This actually matters more than you’d think, because when a ring needs charging, you lose sleep and HRV data.

  • Oura: 7–8 days on a charge, ~1 hr to top up (when ring is still new)

  • Ultrahuman: 4–6 days, 1-2 hrs to charge (when ring is still new)

Price + Subscription Model

Here’s where the philosophies really diverge.

  • Oura: $349–$499 + subscription ($5.99/mo or $69/yr)

  • Ultrahuman: $349, no required subscription
    Optional micro-subscriptions for specific features.

For some people, the subscription is a dealbreaker. For others, the sub is what keeps the experience organized and useful.

App Experience

The app makes or breaks these rings.

  • Oura: clean, minimalist, calming. It makes sense immediately.

  • Ultrahuman: more technical, more dashboards, more knobs to tweak. The data lovers thrive here; the easily overstimulated do not.

Honestly, the app experience is what made me feel so strongly about who each ring is for.

So—Which Should You Pick?

Choose Oura Ring Gen 4 if:

✔ recovery and sleep are your primary goals
✔ you prefer a calm, guided interface
✔ cycle tracking matters to you
✔ you get overwhelmed by raw data
✔ battery life matters
✔ you’re okay with subscriptions

Choose Ultrahuman Ring Air if:

✔ you hate subscriptions
✔ you’re biohack-inclined and enjoy experimentation
✔ AFib, circadian tools, and tech-y metrics excite you
✔ you want more metabolic or wearable stack integration (e.g., CGM)
✔ you want the lightest wearable possible

Both are excellent, both are low EMF compared to watches, and both are good replacements for people who dislike being constantly “pinged” by a smartwatch.

Final Thoughts

The best ring isn’t the one with the most features—it’s the one that fits your brain and your tolerance for input. Cognitive load, energy, and overwhelm matter just as much as accuracy and metrics.

If you’ve tried either, I genuinely want to know your experience—especially if you switched between the two.

Discount Code:

UltraHuman did provide us a discount code that gets you at least 10% off the price of a new ring: ULTRAMMM10

A few notes on how I personally use the rings to improve my health

For myself, it’s not just about the day to day scores and prompts, but the longterm patterning. I’ve been using the Oura Ring for 5-6 years now and as such have data over weeks, months and years. I compare my sleep scores, HRV, recovery and resilience to longerterm health strategies I’m trialling as well as to my labs. For example, due to my pregnancy I became very anemic in August and September hitting an all time high for stress markers in September. I started going for regular IV’s (in addition to supportive supplements); alternating iron and modified Meyer’s cocktails resulting in a return to peak scores by December. What does this tell us? It tells us that anemia has widespread effects beyond just making us fatigued. Exactly the type of lessons i’m looking for. I’ve written about the impact of anemia and subsequent low oxygen tension on the nervous system on our instagram page if you’d like to learn more.

Next
Next

Top Ten Tips to Help MCAS Patients Tolerate Treatment